We earn commission when you buy through affiliate links.
This does not influence our reviews or recommendations.Learn more.
Bitbucket vs. GitHub: Which one is better for you?
Version control is used in software development to keep changes to source code under control.
Despite its near-universal adoption, using Git on its own is difficult, mainly because it lacks user-friendly interfaces.
This is why tools have emerged that build on Git technology and add additional services and functionality to it.
Two of the tools that offer a Git front-end stand out for their popularity: Bitbucket and Github.
Key features of Bitbucket
Bitbucket stands out for its robust integration with popular tools for teams.
For example, JIRA.
Other notable integration options include Crucible, Bamboo, Jenkins, and HipChat.
Another virtue of Bitbucket is its enterprise-grade security feature set.
Its private repositories manage source code with security as a priority.
GitHub: Overview
GitHubis a source code control service with a huge open source community.
Unlike Bitbucket, which prioritizes private repositories, GitHub focuses on public repositories, making code easy to share.
For this, it offers its GitHub Pages, a feature for publishing and hosting content within GitHub.
But it is indispensable for keeping the philosophy ofopen source softwarealive.
Also very useful is an integrated issue tracker, which helps track defects and bugs in the software.
GitHub has native desktop applications for Windows and Mac, as well as an Android app.
It supports over 200 programming languages and virtually every file format imaginable.
Finally, GitHub offers an architecture of APIs that facilitate the integration of third-party tools.
On the other hand, Bitbucket never had such a strong focus on open source.
Initially, its interface was more complex and unwieldy than that of GitHub.
Recently, though, this has changed to the point where it receives favorable reviews for its user experience.
Bitbuckets interface is centered on a control panel that gives users easy access to their repositories.
For example, when you gotta manage large open source projects.
Its additional tools, such as GitHub Desktop, further expand the possibilities for managing Git code collaboratively.
Bitbucket offers intelligent mirroring for distributed teams.
Preferred Use Cases for GitHub
GitHub has earned a reputation as the open source development platform.
But GitHub is also home to many well-known companies and projects prioritizing open source.
For example, the React and Bootstrap frameworks trust their code to GitHub.
Pricing and Comparisons: Bitbucket vs GitHub
Bitbucket prices vary according to the number of users.
Bitbucket integration options (Jira, Trello, CI/CD) are available in all pricing plans.
Bitbucket also offers self-hosted options, with one-time or annual payment options.
There is, however, a limitation of 3 contributors and 500 MB of storage per private repository.
Conclusions
GitHub and Bitbucket aresource code management toolsbased on Git.
Both are robust, reliable, and relatively easy to learn.
These qualities have made them the largest repository management platforms on the market.
They have many similarities, which makes choosing between them difficult.
And if you want to, you might keep your free account on the other.
