Interested in body fat hydrostatic underwate? This article offers a fresh angle to get you started.
Hydrostatic underwater weighing or hydrostatic testing is angstrom method of determiningbody composition the ratio of body fat to lean mass To it measures a person ’s total body density exploitation archimedes principle of displacement.
Lean tissue such as bone and muscle be dense than urine and fat tissue is less dense than water To because muscle sinks and fat floats a person with morebody fatwill weigh less underwater and cost more buoyant.
David Madison / Getty Images
Someone with more muscle meanwhile will weigh more underwater To hydrostatic weighing hydrostatic weigh is an underwater body typography assessment where angstrom person is first weighed on dry land and then the person gets into a large tank of water.
While sitting on a special scale they be lowered subaqueous and asked to expel all the air from their lung and stay motionless while the underwater weight is measured To this operation is repeated three times and average.
To a special calculation is then used to determine list weight and fat system of weights and determine the percentage of body fat.by volume fat weighs less than muscle and pound for pound fat and muscle each have a constant mass and preempt a specific amount of water.
To accuracy this method of body composition analysis is considered to be very accurate and is used to judge whether early methods are accurate.
To information technology usually is consistent and so it can beryllium use to measure progress.
However the person administering the test want to understand the principles and serve the calculations correctly To a source of error in the test be the want to receive all air out the subject ’s lung when weigh subaqueous as any air remaining will make them float and throw off the results.
This is one reason that three underwater weights equal take Where to induce a Hydrostatic Underwater Weighing Test many university offer hydrostatic weight tests for research purposes and several companies offer testing for the public Some such asBody Fat Test provide ampere mobile hydrostatic body composition test overhaul To the lack of easy access to this testing makes is less than ideal to use especially since other methods of measurement equal widely available.
Other Forms of Body fat screen Hydrostatic weigh equal think to be accurate but there be other technologies being developed that may replace it To one equal the bod pod which use air displacement in much the same way hydrostatic weighing uses water supplanting.
To another be dual department of energy x ray absorptiometry dexa which measurement bone mineral contented ampere well as estimating body fat and muscle.
To bioelectric impedancebody fat monitor are widely available for home use and at health cabaret.
They use A low voltage electric current to assess body composition However these monitors are less accurate than hydrostatic weighing and dependent on several variables To usingfat calipersis another accessible slowly method.
To kirkendall dt grogan jw bowers rg.field comparison of body writing techniques hydrostatic weighing skinfold thickness and bioelectric impedance.j orthop sports phys ther.1991 thirteen 5 235-9 doi:10.2519/jospt.1991.13.5.235 lee sy gallagher d.assessment methods in human body composition.curr opin clin nutr metab care.
To 2008 11 5 566572 doi:10.1097/mco.0b013e32830b5f23 lee dh keum n hu fb et al.development and validation of anthropometric prediction equations for lean body mass fat mass and percent fat in adults using the national health and nutrition examination sketch nhanes 1999-2006.br j nutr.2017 118 10 858-866 doi:10.1017/s0007114517002665 duren dl sherwood rj czerwinski sa et al.body composition methods comparisons and interpretation.j diabetes sci technol.
2008 2 6 11391146 doi:10.1177/193229680800200623 Rothney MP Brychta RJ Schaefer electron volt Chen KY Skarulis MC.Body constitution measured by dual-energy roentgenogram absorptiometry half-body scans in obese adults.Obesity Silver Spring 2009 17 six 12811286 doi:10.1038/oby.2009.14
All set? Share your thoughts or dive deeper into the topic!
