Save this article to read it later.
Find this story in your accountsSaved for Latersection.
Why did the long arm of the law only apprehend one half ofFilliam H. Muffman?
According to the complaint, this witness explained, in substance, how the college entrance exam scheme worked.
CW-1 has advised investigators that Huffman and her spouse agreed to the plan, the document alleges.
Do we want two days?
Macy allegedly asked this witness, later saying, Shell score higher.
Just her base score will be higher if we did it over two days.
Attorneys Office declined to say why theShamelessactor isnt facing charges.
There are a couple of different possibilities.
Why was Macy kept (semi-)anonymous in the complaint?
Or prosecutors could simply not be ready to charge them yet.
(On Tuesday afternoon, Macyturned upin court alongside his lawyer.)
Veteran criminal attorney Murray Richman expressed similar views.
If theres no active participation in the wrongdoing, the spouse will not be charged, he explained.
Mere knowledge, even with the presence, does not constitute criminal conduct.
The couples joint publicist did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Huffmans agents office also deferred a request for comment to the publicist.
